ST. JOHN’S, Antigua, CMC – The poor quality of the interventions by opposition members during the recent debates in the House of Representatives is cause for grave concern.
Our system is based on representative democracy, by which the majority of the electorate in constituencies elect persons to represent their concerns and advance the nation’s interests.
Essential to the success of representative democracy are constructive contributions to the critical matters that the nation’s Parliament must consider.
Neither the National Assembly nor the Senate is political hustings, where regrettably, politicians indulge in smear campaigns, pedaling misleading information, and downright lies. Parliament is the forum for responsible and productive contributions to the nation’s affairs. The reckless statements, which pass for political conduct, on the hustings should end when representatives enter the chambers of Parliament.
However, it was evident from the statements and behavior of some of the opposition representatives that they needed to transition from political hustings to parliamentary responsibility. Yet, this transition is necessary if they wish to be seen as capable of being part of a government in the future and if they are to engage meaningfully and constructively in the nation’s affairs.
Meaningful and constructive engagement does not mean an absence of criticism or disagreement, but it does require thoughtful ideas that are presented and supported by facts and sustainable arguments.
That differs from the parliamentary diet most Opposition members fed the nation during the recent debates. Instead, the presentations lacked intellectual rigor, were pedestrian, and replete with lies, misinformation, and hogwash.
As if they had not transitioned from the deplorable deceptions of their political meetings to the venerable halls of Parliament, they unpacked the same lamentable litany of vitriolic, personal attacks and deliberate falsehoods that embodied their political campaigning.
Despite the abundance of information and supporting evidence in the estimates and the budget statement, the majority of the opposition representatives were so blinded by their egos, political ambitions, and, maybe, the absence of any real and practical ideas that they fabricated their facts and imputed improper motives on ABLP Parliamentarians without a scintilla of supporting evidence.
None of this augurs well for their contributions to the nation’s affairs during global turmoil when all hands are needed on deck, and all shoulders are required at the wheel to navigate the ship of state safely and securely. Nor does it recommend them for positive roles in a government of the future.
Discord and the promotion of unreasoned conflict might pass for techniques in banal political campaigns. Still, in Parliament, where a higher standard is expected, such behavior reveals either a lack of vital capacity or a deliberate attempt to undermine the national welfare by evil acts of dishonesty, disinformation, and deception.
I recall that while I served on the opposition benches of the National Assembly, there were members – one of them still a member of the Assembly – who sought vigorously to encourage me to engage in dishonorable behavior to regain power. My retort to those individuals was that I’d rather be an ordinary citizen of a prosperous country than the prime minister of a failed state. I refused to participate in any acts that would harm the land I loved dearly and hoped one day to lead.
I have heard many lies in the National Assembly. Those lies are not constructive to debating the nation’s affairs. They are, in themselves, unworthy of a place in parliamentary debate. Still, when the lies are blatantly entrenched in the consciousness of parliamentary representatives such that they lie shamelessly and irresponsibly, contemptuous of the national good, then we are developing a severe problem in society.
The resort to blatant lies by representatives, either because they are incapable of any higher academic standard or because they have adopted lies as a technique for national disruption, seriously undermines representative democracy and the rule of law in our country. It is a slippery slope to the anarchy that would harm the nation and all its people.
There may be no point in appealing to these opposition politicians to raise the bar of their parliamentary behavior. But they should be mindful that no society will long tolerate the promotion of discord based on lies, nor will it abide the feckless abandonment of responsibilities by those to whom people entrusted the care for their interest.
Parliament is about attending to the people’s business and not pursuing narrow political ambitions at the expense of the nation’s progress.
and then 