HAMILTON, Bermuda, CMC – Bermuda’s Information Commissioner Gitanjali Gutierrez has expressed concerns about a controversial government plan to introduce fees for requests under public access to information (PATI) legislation submitted on the island eight years ago.
Gutierrez said that of 136 jurisdictions with PATI-style legislation, only a handful required applicants to pay a fee.
“Yes, there is a nominal fee in 14 jurisdictions,” she said. “That doesn’t mean it’s suitable for Bermuda when we have the highest cost of living in the world.
“It doesn’t fulfill the purposes of the PATI Act to make people jump through one more hoop.”
Gutierrez told the Royal Gazette newspaper that some jurisdictions with a fee also had documents more easily accessible, meaning there was less need to make PATI requests.
She noted that some PATI requests had already increased accessibility in Bermuda, including lists of restaurant health ratings and licensed childcare providers.
“The part that concerns me the most is that creating a fee – even if it’s a nominal fee – is going to create a practical barrier that very well may take this right away from many Bermudians and residents,” she said.
Gutierrez noted the high cost of living on the island, stating that the additional fee would burden those who want to exercise their rights.
She also voiced concerns about the change’s impact on privacy.
Gutierrez said she hoped the issue would be the subject of public consultation, so the voices of the community were considered before the fees were implemented.
“This is a public right, and certainly in other jurisdictions, if you are going to lessen or change a right to public information, those are the kinds of things that usually go out to public consultation,” she said.
Gutierrez was supported by the head of a global human rights organization, who said Bermuda’s citizens should not have to pay to request publicly held records.
Toby Mendel, executive director of the Centre for Law and Democracy, told the Gazette that the government’s plan to bring public access to information fee was “punitive” and aimed at discouraging requests.
Mendel, a lawyer and expert on freedom of information legislation said: “As a matter of principle, one should not have to pay to exercise a human right.
“Furthermore, it will cost the government more to collect the fee than it costs, so it needs to be clarified financially.
“These are punitive measures to try to deter requests. As such, we are strongly opposed to them.”
The Public Access to Information (PATI) Act 2010 was enacted on April 1, 2015, during the former One Bermuda Alliance administration’s one term in office.
PATI had taken a long time to get off the ground in Bermuda, with the Progressive Labour Party (PLP) Premier Alex Scott promising in 2003 that his administration would launch it soon. The PLP returned to power in 2017.
In this year’s Budget statement, Premier and Minister of Finance David Burt said that the government would launch a “nominal” fee for PATI requests – although the price would not be applied to private individuals who seek information about the government’s data on them.
He said a government authority spent more than $300,000 to respond to a single PATI request, although there needed to be details about the request or why it cost so much.
Tourism and Cabinet Office Minister Vance Campbell said this week that the government expects to raise US$50,000 by introducing PATI fees in the coming fiscal year.
On Monday, Campbell revealed the figure as part of his Budget brief on the Cabinet Office departments in the House of Assembly but still needs to show how much the new fee would be.
and then 