BELIZE-COURT-CCJ orders the bank to repay customer money transferred from its account without authorization

0
374

PORT OF SPAIN, Trinidad, CMC – The Caribbean Court of Justice (CCJ) Tuesday ordered the Belize-based Caye International Bank Ltd to repay more than US$170,000 to the Panama-based Rosemore International Corp after dismissing an appeal by the bank.

The five-member CCJ panel of judges, in a ruling read out by Justice Andrew Burgess, held that Caye Bank breached its Quincecare duty to Rosemore and that it should have contacted the company, given the red flags that had been raised during the transaction.

Rosemore, a customer of Caye Bank, had successfully sued the bank in the High Court of Belize to recover money deducted from its account without its authorization or consent.

Caye Bank is an international bank operating in Belize and providing online funds transfer services to its customers. Rosemore is a company registered in Panama and was one of Caye Bank’s online banking customers through a Depository Agreement and an Indemnity Agreement between the two.

Caye Bank offered Rosemore, as it did for all its customers, the use of its secure online banking portal to conduct online transactions and gave it two sets of unique credentials to access the online banking portal known only to Rosemore.

The dispute arose over US$175,000, which Caye Bank transferred on April 23, 2015, from Rosemore’s account into an account in Canada.

When the funds were transferred, Caye Bank believed that the transfer was on the instruction of Rosemore. The instruction was sent via a compromised email account, to which the fraudster had gained access and sent a message that appeared to be a legitimate request from Rosemore.

When Rosemore discovered the fraud, it notified Caye Bank, but the bank refused liability for the transaction, claiming it had processed it correctly.

On March 30, 2016, Rosemore sued Caye Bank, and the fraudster claiming damages for breach by Caye Bank of the express and implied terms of the Depository Agreement and, in the alternative, damages for negligence by Caye Bank, its agents, and servants.

The fraudster took no steps in the proceeding, and a default judgment was entered against him.

However, the claim continued against Caye Bank, and the High Court gave judgment for Rosemore, holding that Caye Bank had breached its express and implied duties to Rosemore to exercise reasonable skill and care. Caye Bank appealed to the Court of Appeal, which upheld the judgment of the High Court.

On February 15 last year, Caye Bank appealed the decision of the Court of Appeal to the CCJ, which reviewed the Depository Agreement’s verification clause and found no evidence that Caye Bank needed to follow the verification identification process contemplated by that clause correctly.

Nevertheless, the CCJ decided that Caye Bank was subject to ‘the Quincecare duty,’ an implied term that imposed a negative duty to refrain from executing a customer’s order if the bank was ‘put on inquiry’ that its customer may be subject to fraud; and a positive duty to do something more than not comply with payment instruction.

The CCJ found that Caye Bank was put on inquiry as there were several red flags. The substantial amount requested to be transferred is suspicious, given that the account’s history showed that there had been only one insubstantial withdrawal of US$1,915.76 in 2012.

In addition, the CCJ found that the request came from an address, not the domain address on record for Rosemore; there were observable differences between the signature on the wire transfer request form and the authorized signature.

“Given the red flags, a senior official from Caye Bank ought to have contacted Rosemore to verify the transaction, which was not done. The Court, therefore, held that Caye Bank breached its Quincecare duty to Rosemore,” the CCJ said, ordering Caye International Bank Ltd also to pay costs.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here