BASSETERRE, St. Kitts– Churches and non-governmental organizations (NGOs) have written to Prime Minister Dr. Timothy Harris urging him to name a date for the general election, warning also that a code of conduct should be implemented to ensure “the society is not plunged into election induced chaos” as voters in this twin-island Federation prepare to elect a new government.
In their June 8 letter to Harris, the churches and the NGOs listed several issues they want the relevant authorities to consider, including a pre-election period of sensitivity, neutrality in the electoral process, and the delay in annou8ncing the election date, and the abuse of office.
“We are of the firm view that executing the Code of Conduct should be mandatory after every dissolution of the National Assembly to ensure that our society is not plunged into election-induced chaos, as emotions are heightened during election campaigns. We, therefore, anticipate your soonest execution of the Code of Conduct in your capacity as Political Leader of the People’s Labour Party,” the groups wrote in their letter.
The St. Kitts Christian Council sent the letter; the St. Kitts Evangelical Association; the Nevis Christian Council; the Nevis Evangelical Association; The St. Kitts Nevis Chamber of Industry and Commerce; and the St. Kitts and Nevis Bar Association.
Harris is yet to announce a date for the election after he dismissed several of his ministers and asked the Governor-General to dissolve Parliament as his coalition Team Unity government collapsed because of internal wrangling.
Legislators of two of the coalition – the People’s Action Movement (PAM) and the Concerned Citizens Movement (CCM) – that controlled seven of the nine seats in Cabinet had filed a motion of no confidence in Harris. Still, he scuttled that move by having the Parliament dissolved.
In their letter, the groups said they were also raising “some concerns observed by our non-governmental organizations which can diminish our people’s confidence in our electoral system, create social instability, cause widespread anxiety, negatively affect the local economic climate, and undermine the respect for true democracy and the rule of law in our Federation.”
During the pre-election period of sensitivity, the letter noted that the “Executive, led by your Cabinet of Ministers, should refrain from implementing major policy decisions that are likely to commit an incoming Government.
“Ministers remain in office and charge of their departments, but it is customary to observe discretion in announcing new initiatives or of a long-term character in their capacity as a minister. The Executive should refrain from making significant appointments to or sanctioning employment of persons within the Civil Service, ancillary government employment or benefit programs, and other government-owned entities.
“We were reminded of the preceding conventions associated with the operation of our Constitution when, for example, in a recent public announcement on May 30, 2022, you referred to a policy decision made by the current Cabinet of Ministers as being “good news provided by the Team Unity Administration and more particularly, by the People’s Labour Party.” This reference – and other major announcements made by you and your Cabinet of Ministers within the past two weeks – run counter to the pre-election period of sensitivity conventions and can be reasonably seen as being used for political gain.”
The groups said that significant policy decisions and public statements are even more concerning to “our organizations as your Cabinet of Ministers only consists of three (3) elected Members of the now-dissolved National Assembly.
“You have therefore constituted a Cabinet with less than one-third (1/3) of elected representatives of the people. While it may be within your constitutional right, as Prime Minister, to do so, please be reminded that we are a people who have expressly stated in our Constitution that we believe in a true democracy where the voice of the people is paramount.
“The actions of your Cabinet of Ministers, made up of a minority of elected representatives of the people, should therefore be even more sensitive in nature and limited in scope at this time to conform with constitutionally connected conventions.”
They warned that “continued actions in breach of such conventions and fundamental democratic principles will only harm our maturing democracy,” reminding Harris of activities that may be deemed as abuse of office.
“A public official commits an offense of abuse of office if they — seeks or accepts personal or private benefit for themself or a member of their family or a person associated with them, whether or not the help places them under an obligation to the person giving or offering the benefit. Uses public funds or resources for private purposes, including party political purposes. Fails to act impartially or gives undue preferential treatment to a person or group.
and then 