KINGSTOWN, St. Vincent, CMC – Prime Minister Dr. Ralph Gonsalves is traveling to Venezuela on Saturday, where he will hold talks with President Nicolas Maduro on the ongoing border dispute with Guyana.
“If you ask me any question about whether I am going to Venezuela to discuss this, I wouldn’t answer you. I’ll tell you that I am going to Venezuela,” Gonsalves told a news conference on Friday, adding that the border dispute between Georgetown and Caracas “troubles me greatly.
“I just want to see the principles of international law followed, that there be peace, there be no use or threat of force in this particular controversy,” said Gonsalves, whose ruling Unity Labour Party (ULP) administration is a close ally of the Venezuelan government.
“And, as Guyana pursues its case before the International Court of Justice, I am hopeful that both sides would still have a conversation, if not on the specific issue of the border controversy, on other matters … including respect for international law, the principles of international law and that no force or threat of force,” Gonsalves said, noting that both countries are neighbors.
Earlier this week, the United Nations Secretary-General, Antonio Guterres, expressed concern at the recent escalation of tension between Guyana and Venezuela, saying he trusts that both parties “will demonstrate good faith and avoid any action that would aggravate or extend the controversy.”
On Wednesday, the Guyana government Wednesday denied Venezuela’s claim of joint efforts by the United States and Georgetown to increase a military presence along the border with Guyana, with Caracas also accusing President Irfaan Ali of continuing to “refuse to engage in direct dialogue” with the South American country on the border issue.
“The Foreign Ministry is not aware of that. That appears to be the usual posture of Venezuela, which is to mislead and to create division in the region. I think they’re failing at that miserably,” Foreign Minister Hugh Todd said in response to an official statement by Caracas.
Todd said Caracas was spewing its usual propaganda, adding, “This is what Caracas is engaging in: a lot of misinformation and a lot of propaganda, and this is for their local consumption to build momentum in the lead-up to their so-called referendum that they’re planning on the December 3”.
He urged Caracas to pay attention to the motion that was passed by the National Assembly on Monday, denouncing the referendum that seeks a popular vote on the annexation of Guyana’s Essequibo County and non-participation in the International Court of Justice adjudication of Guyana’s case on the validity of the 1899 Arbitral Tribunal Award on the land boundary between the two countries.
The statement by Venezuela comes less than 48 hours after the Guyana parliament, in a rare case of national unity, formally rejected Venezuela’s claims to ownership of the mineral and forest-rich county of Essequibo through a referendum on December 3, with both government and opposition legislators denouncing the move by Caracas.
Guyana has already asked the International Court of Justice (ICJ) to block several questions proposed by Venezuela, seeking a popular vote to support the South American government’s stance of not recognizing the ICJ to settle the decades-old border issue.
Venezuela’s planned referendum and its approved questions for the referendum later this year have set off a wave of criticisms, with the Guyana government accusing Venezuela of trying to annex parts of the country’s territory in contravention of international law.
The 15-member Caribbean Community (CARICOM), the London-based Commonwealth Secretariat, and the Organization of American States (OAS) have also rejected the referendum stating that international law strictly prohibits the Government of one State from unilaterally seizing, annexing, or incorporating the territory of another state and noted that the referendum would open the door to the possible violation of this fundamental tenet of international law.
During his news conference, Gonsalves also described it as “entirely unacceptable.” the situation in Gaza, where Israel has been responding to an attack on its territory by Hamas on October 7, resulted in the deaths of thousands of people on both sides.
Gonsalves said that St. Vincent and the Grenadines are adopting the position of the UN Secretary-General that Gaza has become a graveyard for the Palestinian children.
“Even if Israel establishes a right to … self-defense in respect of what happened on October 7 with Hamas in Israel, self-defense cannot be disproportionate.
“If it is self-defense, you can’t have revenge and genocide as part of self-defense, and you cannot impose collective punishment.”
Gonsalves said these things are illegal in international humanitarian and human rights law and have been pronounced on by the United Nations “and the relevant entities that study these matters.”
Gonsalves said that Kingstown supported the resolution that called for a humanitarian truce at the UN General Assembly a few weeks ago.
“The initial resolution which we co-sponsored — only Belize and St. Vincent and the Grenadines did the co-sponsoring but all other CARICOM (Caribbean Community) countries voted for the resolution….save and except Haiti, which abstained, and Jamaica did not conclude its position and therefore did not vote.”
Gonsalves said the original formulation in the resolution, which spoke to the question of a “cease-fire,” was reworded as a “humanitarian truce.
“It attracted 120 votes, 14 are against, including the Americans, and 40-odd countries abstained, including the bulk of America’s allies in Europe and elsewhere,” the prime minister said.
“Now, there has come a time when the international community must speak out. What has happened there in Gaza is horrendous,” he said, using “a simple parallel” in the domestic context to illustrate, saying it would be wrong to take a dagger and chop off the hand or take a gun and shoot someone who boxed you in the chest.
“And I then can’t say because you box me in my chest, go and hunt down your whole family,” Gonsalves said.
“Everything is not on the same footing between the domestic and the international but to the extent that an analogy, though not the best form.
and then 